• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Our Services
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Top Nav Social Icons

FindBiometrics

FindBiometrics

Global Identity Management

NEC banner
  • Biometrics
    • What are Biometrics?
    • FAQ
    • Biometric Associations
    • Companies
    • Premier Partners
  • News
    • Featured Articles
    • Interviews
    • Thought Leadership
    • Podcasts
    • Webinars
    • Year in Review
  • Applications
    • Biometric Security
    • Border Control and Airport Biometrics
    • Consumer and Residential Biometrics
    • Financial Biometrics
    • Fingerprint & Biometric Locks
    • Healthcare Biometrics
    • Justice and Law Enforcement Biometrics
    • Logical Access Control Biometrics
    • Mobile Biometrics
    • Other Biometric Applications
    • Physical Access Control Biometrics
    • Biometric Time and Attendance
  • Solutions
    • Behavioral Biometrics
    • Biometric Sensors and Detectors
    • Facial Recognition
    • Biometric Fingerprint Readers
    • Hand Readers & Finger Scanners
    • Iris Recognition
    • Biometric Middleware and Software
    • Multimodal Biometrics
    • Physiological Biometrics
    • Smart Cards
    • Vein Recognition
    • Voice and Speech Recognition
  • Stocks
  • Events
  • Directory
  • Podcasts

EFF Makes Case for Private Use of Facial Recognition

January 21, 2021

The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has tried to articulate the difference between the public and private use of facial recognition. The privacy watchdog has consistently pushed to ban the government use of the technology, but believes that private use should still be permissible as long as strict regulations are put in place.

EFF Makes Case for Private Use of Facial Recognition

In that regard, the EFF noted that there are some socially beneficial uses of the technology. For example, many people use facial recognition to unlock their smartphones. Other factors may be more secure, but facial recognition remains a convenient option that raises the world’s overall security posture, and should be available to people who might not use other features.

By the same token, facial recognition could be used as part of a public demonstration, even if only to highlight the potential dangers of the technology. A full private ban would prevent such uses and limit protest activities and other forms of public expression.

With that in mind, the EFF believes that private facial recognition should be legal, with some considerable limitations. Most notably, private entities should not be allowed to collect or share any facial information without explicit written consent, and should be barred from selling faceprints in any capacity. Faceprints that are collected should be gathered for a specific purpose, and should be discarded once that purpose has been accomplished, or after a certain amount of time. Finally, face data should be stored securely, to prevent malicious actors from gaining access to people’s personal information.

The EFF also advocated for minimization, a principle that argues that facial recognition should only be used to provide people with something that has been explicitly requested. Private entities should similarly not be allowed to retaliate against anyone that chooses not to use facial recognition, as would be the case if those entities force people to pay higher fees or suffer worse service if they choose to preserve their privacy.

Of course, those laws would need some teeth to make sure that private companies cannot choose to ignore them. To that end, the EFF stressed the need for a “private right of action” that allows individual citizens to take legal action against private entities that violate the law. The organization cited Illinois’ Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) as an example of such legislation, and suggested that it should be implemented on a national scale.

While the EFF is in favor of private use, it came down against retail outlets and other establishments that use facial recognition to identify and market to their customers. Venues that deploy the technology are doing so without obtaining written consent, and are often leveraging user information pulled from other sources (such as online activity). The EFF also spoke out against private companies like Clearview AI that market facial recognition to the government, noting that any laws would need to close those public sector loopholes.

The EFF has backed public facial recognition bans all over the country, though it did not support the private ban that was implemented in Portland, Oregon. The organization has spoken out against the Department of Homeland Security’s recent efforts to expand its collection powers

–

January 21, 2021 – by Eric Weiss

Related News

  • EFF Calls for Stricter Facial Recognition RegulationsEFF Calls for Stricter Facial Recognition Regulations
  • AnyVision Emphasizes Need for Ethical and Unbiased Facial Recognition SystemsAnyVision Emphasizes Need for Ethical and Unbiased Facial Recognition Systems
  • Gartner Offers Ethical Advice for Those Using Biometric Facial RecognitionGartner Offers Ethical Advice for Those Using Biometric Facial Recognition
  • Chinese Citizens Raise Concerns About Leaks of Biometric DataChinese Citizens Raise Concerns About Leaks of Biometric Data
  • Clearview AI Facing Even More Investigations Over Biometric Data ScrapingClearview AI Facing Even More Investigations Over Biometric Data Scraping
  • EFF Quiz Asks: Which Government Agencies Have Access to Your FaceEFF Quiz Asks: Which Government Agencies Have Access to Your Face

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Biometric, biometrics, biometrics regulation, EFF, Electronic Frontier Foundation, ethical guidelines, ethical issues, face biometrics, facial recognition, Privacy, privacy issues

Primary Sidebar

IDEMIA big box

Read the Latest 2020 Year in Review Analysis:

Thales digital ID

Sponsored Links

AU10TIX, an identity management company headquartered in Israel, provides critical, modular solutions to link physical and digital identities so that companies and their customers can confidently connect.

CMITech is a leading provider of high performance, cost effective iris recognition systems. The company is setting the industry standard for advanced user interfaces that are fast, intuitive and effortless. Serving enrollment and authentication solutions of all sizes, CMITech systems include binoculars-type, wall mount, desktop, and kiosk-type product configurations.

Onfido is building the new identity standard for the internet.Our AI-based technology assesses whether a user’s government-issued ID is genuine or fraudulent, and then compares it against their facial biometrics. That’s how we give companies like Revolut, Zipcar and Bitstamp the assurance they need to onboard customers remotely and securely. Our mission is to create a more open world, where identity is the key to access.. For more information, please visit
www.onfido.com
TECH5 is an international technology company headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, with branches in the US, Europe and Asia, dedicated to the design, development, and distribution of biometrics-driven Identity Management solutions. Target markets include Government and Private sectors with products powering Civil ID, Digital ID, eKYC, Digital Onboarding, Visitor Management and others. Learn more:
www.tech5.ai
ThreatMark brings trust to the digital world by providing cutting-edge fraud prevention solutions. Major banks use ThreatMark's AI-powered technology and behavioral biometrics to build secured banking experience to precisely verify their legitimate users, seamlessly across all digital channels. All while securing the users' most precious assets and keeping the fraudsters away. Learn more:
www.threatmark.com/
Aware ABIS webinar
MobileIDWorld

Mobile ID World is here to bring you the latest in mobile authentication solutions and application providers. Our company is dedicated to providing users with the best content and cutting edge information on technology, news, and mobile solutions for your mobile identity management needs.

Thales digital ID

Recent Posts

  • Innovatrics Earns High Marks in DHS Biometric Technology Rally
  • Auraya Updates Voice Biometrics Platform With Release of EVA 2.0
  • Intercede Integrates Aware’s Biometric Tech Into MyID Credentialing Solution
  • INTERVIEW: Aware CEO Bob Eckel on Addressing the Biometrics Industry’s Biggest Challenges
  • Webinar Announcement: It’s Time to Get Serious About Healthcare Biometrics

Biometric Associations

IBIA and fido
Aware ABIS webinar

Tweets

Footer

  • About Us
  • Company Directory
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Archives

Follow Us

Copyright © 2021 FindBiometrics